Research question: Does capital punishment deter homicide crimes?
Working thesis statement: Capital punishment ends up consuming taxpayers’ money because it
does not meet its intended purpose of deterrence of homicide
...
Research question: Does capital punishment deter homicide crimes?
Working thesis statement: Capital punishment ends up consuming taxpayers’ money because it
does not meet its intended purpose of deterrence of homicide crimes.
Annotated Bibliography
Liu, B. S., Wojcik, S. P., & Ditto, P. H. (2018). Moral Coherence Processes and Denial of Moral
Complexity. Atlas of Moral Psychology, 371.
The authors argue that moral judgment is a perceptive scenario, best understood as a
process of definite meaning making that usually leads to forswearing of good
multifaceted nature and the forming of clear convictions to be considered with
prescriptive instincts. They also argue that capital punishment aligns with the Catholic
catechism and public safety. Moreover, they consider that individual’s inclination to
conflate good and reasonable great assumes a vital job in intensifying political clash. This
information is very useful to support my argument on the relationship between capital
punishment and deterrence of homicide crime rate.
(Book)
Lundberg, A. (2019). On the Public Finance of Capital Punishment. Available at SSRN 3367170.
Lundberg argues that a capital preliminary is an exorbitant issue. At the point when a
neighborhood government bears the cost of preliminary, it must raise reserves or
reallocate them from different sources. In Texas, among different states, the expense of
preliminary is borne basically at the province level and also capital punishment may
accordingly block criminal prevention if its money is left to nearby, as opposed to
brought together government. The information is very important as it will help in
supporting my argument.
(Peer-reviewed article)
Mitchell, J. F. (2017). Commentary, Capital Punishment and the Courts.
According to Mitchell, the most upsetting part of the Supreme Court's guideline of the
death penalty has been its inability to influentially clarify why the Court's decisions
encompassing the utilization of the death penalty ought to beat the choices made by the
political branches. She supports the Steikers’ critique of the efforts put by the court to
control capital punishment. The argument is insightful to my discussion.
(Peer- reviewed article)
[Show More]
