PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE RUBRIC
NO. CRITERIA
PERFORMANCE
SCALE
Developing Functional Proficient Advanced
0 1 2 3 4 5
1
Ability to design and
conducted a
research- based
experiment (P1-P2)
Unable to design/
ide
...
PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE RUBRIC
NO. CRITERIA
PERFORMANCE
SCALE
Developing Functional Proficient Advanced
0 1 2 3 4 5
1
Ability to design and
conducted a
research- based
experiment (P1-P2)
Unable to design/
identify the basic idea /
task of the experiment.
Helps are required to
conduct the whole
experiment.
Has a very low ability to
design/ identify the
basic idea / task of the
experiment.
Helps are required to
conduct the whole
experiment.
Often requires
instructor to design /
identify basic idea /
task of the experiment.
Helps are required with
refinement in several
major details and
conduct the experiment.
Generally able to
design / identify basic
idea / task of the
experiment.
Able to conduct the
experiment with
minimal guide from
the instructor.
Independently
designed / identified
idea / task of the
experiment.
Able to conduct a
research-based
experiment.
Independently
designed / identified
the idea / task of the
experiment with
additional supporting
references.
Show an outstanding
ability in conducting
research-based
experiment.
2
Successfully
performs
experiment without
guidance based on
level of
Openness
(P3-P4)
Cannot complete tasks
and standard
procedures.
Low ability to complete
tasks and standard
procedures.
Successfully complete
experiment procedures
with moderate
supervision.
Successfully complete
experiment procedures
with minimal
supervision.
Successfully complete
experiment
independently.
Successfully complete
experiment
independently.
3
Ability to
manipulate the data
leading to findings
(P5-P6)
Incorrect
interpretation of
trends and comparison
of data indicating a
lack of understanding
of results.
Incomplete
interpretation of trends
and comparison of data
indicating a lack of
understanding of
results.
Minimal with 1
sentence describing the
main finding of the
experiment.
Almost all of the
results have been
correctly interpreted
but without sufficient
support of important
trends or data
comparisons.
All of the results have
been correctly
interpreted, with only 1
sufficient support of
important trends or
data comparisons.
All of the results have
been interpreted
correctly, with sufficient
support of important
trends or data
comparisons
4
Ability to adapt the
obtained result with
logical justification
(P5-P6)
Failed to show any
idea at all
No ability to adapt the
result with any suitable
justification.
Show effort to give
reasonable justification
but incorrect
Display effort to
understand the
finding with major
flawed interpretation
Display effort to
understand the finding
with minimum flawed
interpretation
Show excellent
understanding between
the results to adapt
with logical justification
(CO2:PO5)
Lab Report: CES511 – STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING LABORATORY1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
NO. TITLE PAGES
1 1.0 Introduction 2
2 2.0 Problem Statement 2
3 3.0 Objectives 2
4 4.0 Apparatus 2 - 3
5 5.0 Procedure 4
6
6.0 Data and Analysis
6.1 Table Data and Analysis
6.2 Graph Support A and B
6.3 Sample Calculation
5 6
7 - 8
7 7.0 Discussion 9 - 10
8 8.0 Conclusion 102
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The redundant in form of reaction exist in an indeterminate system. However, static equation
itself unable to solve that particular redundant. The superposition method is one of the
suitable approaches to determine this reaction. The fixed end moment of a fixed end beam is
given by;
MFAB = -W * a * b² / L²
MFBA = -W * a² * b/L²
2.0 PROBLEM STATEMENTS
Structural could be classified into statically determinate and indeterminate system. Static
equation can be used to solve the determinate problem. Meanwhile, superposition method can
be used to solve the indeterminate problem.
3.0 OBJECTIVE
To validate the theoretical equation of fixed end moment of indeterminate beam through
experimental work by using the superposition method for indeterminate beam.
4.0 APPARATUS
1. Support A and B (fixed support both)
2. Beam (1m)
Support A Support B3
3. Load hanger (Reaction A and B)
4. Load hanger (Point load)
5. Load
Reaction A Reaction B4
5.0 PROCEDURE
1. Fixed length support A and B into 1m. Locked the support at bottom.
2. Placed beam at support. Make sure in straight condition. Used screw at supports to
lock.
3. Put the load hanger as point load 0.2 m from support A.
4. Locked the supports.
5. Loosed screw at both support before applied load.
6. Applied load 4N at point load hanger.
7. Applied 2N load as reaction at blue hanger simultaneously. Logically, when applied
load at center of the beam, the reaction both side will be same. But in this case the
applied load is not at center.
8. Check the reading both dial gauges is zero to know the value correct. Applied another
load when the reading at dial gauges still not zero at both side simultaneously.
9. When one side of support becomes zero, stop applied load at both reactions.
10. Applied load at yellow hanger at which support that not to zero. It was for counter
back that applied in blue hanger.
11. Took weight load when reach zero as reaction. The data had been recorded.
12. Repeated step 6 to 11 in order to increasing the load applied.
13. Analyzed the data.
[Show More]
